Purchase this article as a standalone PDF with full colour magazine layout

Why the Right Coach Matters

I had just been hired to create and lead the executive coaching practice at Humana, a Fortune 70 company at the time, focused on health and well-being in the direct care and insurance industries. In addition to internal coaches, I needed external coaches for senior executives and C-suite leaders.

After meeting with senior executives and learning their questions, skepticism, and unfamiliarity with the executive coaching experience, I pondered which coach criteria mattered most and would launch the coaching practice with positive, favourable experiences for executives. Then, and now, coach practice leaders inside companies and executives continue to ask this question.

What companies, HR leaders, and coach practice leaders look for in executive coaches may surprise you. And the criteria and qualifications they seek can make a significant difference in the coaching experience for the executive as well as the organization’s culture. As Chief Coaching Officer at CoachSource, I experience hundreds of companies as they navigate coach qualifications and the coach selection process. These experiences are included in this summary to help executives, HR leaders, and coach practice leaders determine the best possible approach for curating and selecting the best possible coaches for executives in their organizations.

Organizations now expect coaches to bring a blend of proven methodology, robust qualifications, and deep business acumen to their coaching engagements.

Today’s complex leadership environment inside organizations means selecting an executive coach is no longer about finding a wise-sounding confidant with a strong résumé. The coaching profession has matured into a globally recognized field with formal standards, ethical codes, and rigorous credentialing. Organizations now expect coaches to bring a blend of proven methodology, robust qualifications, and deep business acumen to their coaching engagements.

Yet the title “coach” remains unregulated in most countries, meaning anyone can adopt it without formal training, certification, or experience. This creates both opportunity and risk: the opportunity to match executives with highly skilled coaches is growing, and the risk of investing in someone whose skills, ethics, or experience fall shorisre high. For executives (the coachees) and the HR leaders or coach practice leaders who support them, knowing what truly matters in a coach is essential to ensuring a productive engagement with measurable results.

1. Understanding the Professional Landscape of Executive Coaching

Executive coaching is supported by several international professional bodies that set competency standards, ethical guidelines, and credentialing requirements:

• International Coaching Federation (ICF) The largest global body, known for its three-tier credentialing system (ACC, PCC, MCC) and strict ethics standards.

• European Mentoring and Coaching Council (EMCC) Widely respected in Europe and beyond, offering tiered accreditations for coaches, mentors, and supervisors.

• Association for Coaching (AC) A global organization promoting standards, professional development, and ethical practice.

There are other coach training, certification, and credentialing organizations with varying degrees of requirements for coach training, testing, mentor coaching, coach supervision, demonstrated experience, coaching hours with clients, continuing education, and more. These organizations require accredited training, supervised practice, and ongoing development. For example, an ICF Professional Certified Coach (PCC) must complete at least 125 hours of coach-specific training and 500 hours of client coaching experience, along with passing a rigorous performance evaluation. Why this matters: Working with a coach who holds a recognized credential ensures they have met industry standards, adhere to a code of ethics, and engage in continuous professional development.

More companies are deferring to coach credentials from ICF, EMCC and others as a baseline for coach competency

Over the past few years, more companies are deferring to coach credentials from ICF, EMC, C, and others as a baseline for coach competency, experience, and practice. While there is rigorous debate about the impact of deferring to coach credentials as a basis for experience and competence, the reality is that HR professionals and coach practice leaders in organizations must collaborate with procurement, purchasing, and supply chain management to establish guidelines for bringing external coaches into a company, and in some cases, hiring internal coaches as well.

Compliance with procurement policies and best practices has arrived at the executive coaching department, and companies seek coach specifications and quality measures in the same way they seek qualified, reliable software, equipment, and other resources. While this may seem like a stretch, as if the specs for software could be comparable to a human coach, the a need for a proxy for coach quality, experience, expertise, training, ethical compliance, and more conveniently contained in coach credentials. So, for better or worse, we can expect to see coach credentialing as a threshold for inclusion as an external coach, and in some cases, for being hired as an internal coach.

While many executives gravitate toward coaches with senior corporate backgrounds, business experience alone does not make a great coach.

2. Qualifications and Certification Elements That Matter

A coach’s credentials are more than a line on a resume: they are indicators of skill, commitment, and professionalism. Companies and leaders seeking coaching typically consider the following when evaluating potential coaches:

• Coach-specific training programs accredited by ICF, EMCC, or AC to ensure quality and alignment with global competencies in the coaching profession.

• Coach training program reputation and credibility.y. While all coach training programs accredited by ICF, EMCC, or AC are aligned with well-established coaching competencies, each program has its own specialty or approach to effective coaching. Some use evidence-based research or practices, neuroscience, or ontological (systemic) approaches.

• Formal certification Credentials can also be important with coaching for senior leaders requesting the ICF PCC or MCC, EMCC Senior Practitioner or Master Practitioner, and AC Accredited Executive Coach credentials. These credentials continue to be a baseline for consideration as an external coach.

• Ongoing professional development Serious coaches commit to continuous learning and may participate in coaching supervision to refine their practice. Credentialing organizations require various levels, hours, and types of continuing education to maintain or renew their credentials. Ethics training and adherence are marks of professionalism that protect both the executive and the organization, and an area of ethics and adherence to ethical standards afforded by credentialing bodies. These also serve to streamline procurement and supply chain processes, as organizations can defer to these codes of ethics instead of crafting their own codes and setting up mechanisms to audit and enforce them with coaches.

3. Coaching Expertise vs. Business Experience

While many executives gravitate toward coaches with senior corporate backgrounds, business experience alone does not make a great coach. The most effective executive coaches combine:

Mastery of coaching competencies and skills: Active listening, powerful questioning, reframing, facilitating insight, holding clients accountable, etc.

Business acumen: Understanding corporate structures, leadership challenges, organizational politics, revenue models, profit and loss elements, industry trends, basic economics, as well as the nuances of industries or sectors.

The right coach can be a catalyst for sustained growth and strategic impact. For HR, rigorous selection safeguards both the investment and the integrity of leadership development efforts.

Cross-cultural competence.ce. For multinational organizations, the ability to navigate cultural nuances is critical. The balance of coaching expertise and business experience matters: a former CEO without coaching training may rely on advising rather than coaching, while a skilled coach without corporate experience may lack context for the executive’s world. The sweet spot seems to be an executive coach with both formal training and relevant leadership experience that complements the executive’s coaching goals and needs.

4. What HR and Executives Really Look For

Interviews with HR leaders and executives consistently highlight five “fit” factors:

• Chemistry and tru.st. The relationship is the foundation for transformative work.

• Relevant experience, industry knowledge, or familiarity with the executive’s leadership challenges.

• Proven results Demonstrated impact through case studies, references, or measurable outcomes.

• Cultural alignment: An understanding of the organization’s values, leadership expectations, and overall culture.

• Confidentiality is Essential for candid dialogue and executive vulnerability.

5. How to Find a Reputable Coach

With no universal licensing, the burden falls on organizations to vet executive coach providers (companies with a network of executive coaches) or to work directly with coaches. Proven sourcing methods include:

Credentialing directories, Such as ICF’s Coach Finder, EMCC’s Accredited Coach Database, or reputable corporate coaching providers. Professional referrals from trusted HR peers, leadership networks, or board members. Chemistry sessions: A short, no-obligation conversation to assess fit before selecting a coach. Structured interviews asking questions such as:

• “What formal coach training have you completed?”

• “What professional coaching credentials do you hold?”

• “Can you share examples of how you’ve worked with leaders at my level?”

• “How do you measure the success of your coaching engagements?”

6. Making the Right Match

Selecting the right coach is both an art and a science. Once the shortlist is in place:

• Align the coach’s strengths with the executive’s development goals and coaching needs.

• Ensure agreement on confidentiality and stakeholder involvement.

• Define success measures at the start, such as leadership behaviour shifts, feedback from stakeholders, or achievement of strategic goals.

• Support the coaching relationship without interfering with the coach-coachee trust dynamic.

7. Conclusion: The Case for Intentional Selection

After I met with executives at Humana to assess the best way to launch and sustain an executive coaching practice, it was clear that executives would be more engaged with their coaching experience and achieve coaching goals with executive coaches who have:

• at least eight to ten years of coaching senior leaders in large, matrixed organizations

• an ICF PCC credential or equivalent

• coach training based in neuroscience and/or evidence-based practices

• senior-level business experience in healthcare and/or coaching experience with executives in health insurance, senior care, urgent care, or primary care settings

• experience of coaching executives leading rapid change in highly regulated sectors with complex consumer experiences.

• business acumen in direct-to-consumer, government subsidies provider network revenue models.

At first, we partnered with three coach provider firms with coaches who met most of our criteria. Ultimately, we gravitated to one coach provider firm whose coaches met all the criteria, demonstrated coaching impact and goal achievement, and became more engaged with our company strategy and culture. An effective executive coaching engagement begins with an intentional, informed choice. In a profession with many voices, the most successful outcomes occur when the coach’s professional qualifications, coaching competency, business experience, and individual fit align with the executive’s development needs and coaching goals. For executives, the right coach can be a catalyst for sustained growth and strategic impact. For HR, rigorous selection safeguards both the investment and the integrity of leadership development efforts. The key is to go beyond titles and testimonials and choose coaches based on relevant credentials, demonstrated experience, and an authentic connection with the executive.